IP Licence as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v. Panama - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review Année : 2018

IP Licence as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v. Panama

Résumé

The relationship between intellectual property (IP) and investment is old, but the debates are new. Recent high profile cases in which intellectual property rights (IPRs) are being sought to be protected by means of international investment law and treaties have generated visible debate and discussion. In the light of the recent decision on expedited objections in Bridgestone Licensing v. Republic of Panama, this article will explore arguments put forwarded by both parties regarding the interaction between IP Licence Agreements and the definition of investment, as well as the Tribunal's finding on the question whether an IP Licence with a revenue sharing model qualifies as an investment.

Domaines

Droit
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
IP-Licence-as-an-Investment_IP_nr-1_2018_A4.pdf (312.32 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-04080775 , version 1 (25-04-2023)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-04080775 , version 1

Citer

Pratyush Nath Upreti. IP Licence as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v. Panama. Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review , 2018, 1 (1), pp.16. ⟨hal-04080775⟩
14 Consultations
34 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More