HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading that Limits Policy Innovation

Abstract : By examining via a case study the political authority of US proliferation experts since the 1960s, this article contributes to nuclear weapons proliferation studies and to the growing literature on the role of expertise in democracies. First, it argues that policy choices are determined by an understanding of history and that approaching nuclear history as a history of nuclear weapons proliferation is a presumption shared by both US experts and policy makers. Second, it shows that this understanding of history, relying on the metaphorical use of the term proliferation (which was imported from biology), strongly distorts the facts. Third, the article shows that nuclear experts are plagued by a conservative bias as a result of this use of the proliferation metaphor. Instead of challenging the faulty proliferation narrative, most experts have backed it without question. Fourth, the legitimacy that experts lend to this view of history has important political effects: it provides an authoritative assessment of past policies and limits the possibility of political innovation. Policy initiatives tend to be restricted to changes in speed or intensity. The article suggests three changes that might restore room for informed political innovation in nuclear weapons policies.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03579776
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, February 18, 2022 - 11:38:12 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 27, 2022 - 4:08:01 PM

File

npr-18-1-pelopidas.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Benoît Pelopidas. The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading that Limits Policy Innovation. Nonproliferation Review, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2011, 18 (1), pp.297 - 314. ⟨10.1080/10736700.2011.549185⟩. ⟨hal-03579776⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

1

Files downloads

4