Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Economizing on Scientific Debate

Abstract : The book Le négationnisme économique. Et comment s’en débarrasser by Pierre Cahuc and André Zylberberg has sparked a heated debate in the French press and academy. Its aim is to uncover the inadequacies, knowledge gaps, errors, and denials on the part of researchers and public actors who criticize economic science, and especially those who criticize the latter’s dominant current, the so-called mainstream economics. Its main targets are critical economists, particularly “heterodox” or “appalled economists,” but also intellectual figures from other scientific disciplines (Pierre Bourdieu, Michel Onfray, Dominique Méda, Axel Kahn), CEOs (Jean-Louis Beffa, Louis Gallois), politicians (Michel Rocard, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Barbara Romagnan), and newspapers (Alternatives économiques). [First paragraph]
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03567392
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Saturday, February 12, 2022 - 12:01:29 AM
Last modification on : Friday, May 13, 2022 - 3:34:04 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, May 13, 2022 - 6:01:44 PM

File

2018-godechot-economizing-on-s...
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Olivier Godechot. Economizing on Scientific Debate. Books and Ideas, Collège de France, 2018. ⟨hal-03567392⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

2

Files downloads

0