Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting

Abstract : Is criminal disenfranchisement compatible with a democratic political order? This article considers this question in light of a recently developed view that criminal disenfranchisement is justified because it expresses our commitment to democratic values. We call this view expressive disenfranchisement and refer to the general conception in which it is grounded as democratic expressivism. Contra supporters of expressive disenfranchisement, we argue that democratic expressivism does not offer a sound justification of criminal disenfranchisement. Additionally, we argue that, insofar as one really cares about answering serious criminal wrongs via an expression of democratic values, criminal disenfranchisement should be abandoned and replaced with a policy that temporarily obliges the relevant criminals to vote. Democratic expressivists should, in other words, move from supporting the disenfranchisement of serious offenders to endorsing a policy of compulsory criminal voting for a finite period of time.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, February 11, 2022 - 8:01:12 PM
Last modification on : Friday, March 25, 2022 - 3:59:00 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, May 12, 2022 - 7:24:41 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive




Andrei Poama, Tom Theuns. Making Offenders Vote: Democratic Expressivism and Compulsory Criminal Voting. American Political Science Review, 2019, ⟨10.1017/S0003055419000297⟩. ⟨hal-03567087⟩



Record views


Files downloads