System Justification and Affective Responses to Terrorism - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Political Psychology Année : 2019

System Justification and Affective Responses to Terrorism

Résumé

A large stream of research has shown that emotional reactions have a powerful impact on political choices and decision‐making processes. Yet little is known about individual‐level differences in experiencing specific emotions in the light of threatening events. In this article, we argue that system justification, or the endorsement and bolstering of existing social and political arrangements, is positively associated with the experience of positive emotions and negatively associated with the experience of negative emotions in the light of threat. We test our hypotheses using a study conducted a few days after the November 13, 2015, Paris terror attacks on a large sample in France. Our results show that system justification was positively associated with experiencing hope in the light of the attacks and negatively associated with experiencing fear and anger. Moreover, the size of these effects exceeded the respective size of other psychological characteristics such as authoritarianism, conservatism, and national attachment. These findings extend research on the palliative function of system justification to the domain of emotional responses to terrorist shocks.

Dates et versions

hal-03567033 , version 1 (11-02-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Pavlos Vasilopoulos, Sylvain Brouard. System Justification and Affective Responses to Terrorism: Evidence from the November 2015 Paris Attacks. Political Psychology, 2019, ⟨10.1111/pops.12639⟩. ⟨hal-03567033⟩
25 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More