Good Securitization, Bad Securitization - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Pré-Publication, Document De Travail Année : 2011

Good Securitization, Bad Securitization

Résumé

I use a simple banking model to study the circumstances under which excessive and inefficient securitization may occur. I first stress that increasing securitization rates that reduce banks' incentives to screen borrowers and thus lead to more defaults need not be inefficient. This may be an efficient response to higher gains from trade between banks and fixed-income markets in the presence of bank moral hazard. I then argue that if reaping such higher gains from trade induces a reduction in the informational efficiency of the securitization market, then there is room for excessive securitization. The model points at increased transparency and informational efficiency of the securitization market as key improvements for the future of the banking system.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
imes-discussion-paper-11-e-04.pdf (129.24 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-03476052 , version 1 (11-12-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Guillaume Plantin. Good Securitization, Bad Securitization. 2011. ⟨hal-03476052⟩
35 Consultations
138 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More