Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Mill and the Secret Ballot: Beyond Coercion and Corruption

Abstract : In Considerations on Representative Government, John Stuart Mill concedes that secrecy in voting is sometimes justified but, nonetheless, maintains that it should be the exception rather than the rule. This article critically examines Mill's arguments. It shows that Mill's idea of voting depends on a sharp public/private distinction which is difficult to square with democratic ideas about the different powers and responsibilities of voters and their representatives, or with legitimate differences of belief and interest amongst voters themselves. Hence, it concludes, we should reject the assumption, which many of us share with Mill, that the secret ballot is justified only on prudential grounds and recognize how central privacy is to any democratic conception of citizenship and politics.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03459646
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - 2:27:34 AM
Last modification on : Friday, March 25, 2022 - 3:33:01 AM

File

2007-lever-mill-and-the-secret...
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Annabelle Lever. Mill and the Secret Ballot: Beyond Coercion and Corruption. Utilitas, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2007, 19 (3), pp.354 - 378. ⟨10.1017/S0953820807002634⟩. ⟨hal-03459646⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

2

Files downloads

1