Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

Courts at work: Bankruptcy statutes, majority rule and private contracting in England (17th–18th century)

Abstract : Rather than evolving as a platform for renegotiation and debt discharge, as on the Continent, English bankruptcy emerged as a liquidation-only procedure after majority arrangements among creditors were banned in 1621. Over the course of the 17th and 18th centuries, the courts then developed an alternate, private-law set of rules on the basis of the old English trust and the Composition agreement, which belonged of the medieval cross-European Law Merchant. The main advantage of this little-known institution was its perpetual character and the flexibility of its governance, and its main drawback was obviously the requirement of voluntary initial adhesion. Symmetrically, under the Continental model, collective action was easier to obtain but it did not extend beyond the doors of the court. The discussion brings forward two further themes: the symmetry between adjudication and voluntary adhesion to a collective contract; and the capacity of judges to invent new legal concepts out of diverse set of existing rules, rather than through the simple, bottom-up approach usually emphasised by the literature on the Common Law tradition.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03417948
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Saturday, November 6, 2021 - 12:12:33 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, January 18, 2022 - 11:42:04 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Jérôme Sgard. Courts at work: Bankruptcy statutes, majority rule and private contracting in England (17th–18th century). Journal of Comparative Economics, 2016, 44 (2 (May 2016)), pp.450 - 460. ⟨10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.007⟩. ⟨hal-03417948⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

17