HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

The contested legitimacy of investment arbitration and the human rights ordeal: The missing link

Abstract : Introduction: This chapter proceeds from the conviction that the language of human rights - understood here as encompassing collective social and economic needs - is the most disruptive common vocabulary that can be mobilized today, with normative leverage, in order to address at least some of the negative distributional consequences of the current international investment regime. Among these, the most prominent is the imbalance between the advantages accruing to the investor and the lack of correlative obligations or duties on its part toward the host State, whose hands are tied contractually, moreover, on many issues of public regulation. At the same time, the conduct of corporate investors abroad, encouraged and facilitated by the same investment treaties, has not hitherto been subject to any significant degree of regulation in their "home State". [First lines]
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03398940
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Saturday, October 23, 2021 - 4:22:11 PM
Last modification on : Monday, February 14, 2022 - 4:20:02 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Horatia Muir Watt. The contested legitimacy of investment arbitration and the human rights ordeal: The missing link. Walter Mattli; Thomas Dietz. International arbitration and global governance, Oxford University Press, pp.214 - 239, 2014, 9780198716723. ⟨hal-03398940⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

8