Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Marking to Market versus Taking to Market

Abstract : While the debate on cost and market-value accounting has been raging for years, economists lack a framework allowing a comparison of their relative merits. This paper considers an agency model in which the measurement of an asset can be based on public market data (marking to market) and/or on the realization of its value through costly resale to an informed buyer (taking to market). At the optimal contract, noisier market data lead to cost accounting and gains trading (selling winners/keeping losers) whereas accurate data naturally favor market-value accounting. The quality of market data and the magnitude of resale costs both depend on the volume of transactions, and therefore on accounting rules. The paper studies the mutual feedback between individually optimal accounting rules and asset market liquidity. This equilibrium approach reveals a socially excessive use of market-value accounting that dries up market liquidity and reduces the informativeness of price signals.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03393184
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, October 21, 2021 - 9:44:44 PM
Last modification on : Monday, March 21, 2022 - 2:50:36 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, January 22, 2022 - 9:21:36 PM

File

2016-plantin-marking-to-market...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Guillaume Plantin, Jean Tirole. Marking to Market versus Taking to Market. 2016. ⟨hal-03393184⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

5

Files downloads

3