Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Chapitre d'ouvrage

When Rationalisation of Bureaucracy De-rationalizes Laws and Legislatures: ‘Monster Bills’ in France

Abstract : The last decade has seen the development of the so-called ‘monster bills’ in France, that is too say remarkably long laws, putting together heterogeneous elements. Among the notorious examples of them, we investigate the ‘Grenelle laws’ aiming at protecting the environment field (2009) and the ‘Macron Law’ aiming at liberalizing the economy (2015). The development of these laws is interpreted as resulting from two factors: a. the willingness of the executive power to send a diversity of messages to a diversity of audiences through visible legislation, b. pressures from bureaucracies of state departments cyclically willing to promote their reforms in a context of limited access to the legislatures’ agenda. The paper presents this process as well as it consequences for the functioning of the parliament in terms of work-overload, lobbying and MPs influence. The paper supports the view that the inner-logic of rationalization within the State paradoxically lead to de-rationalize the legislative procedure, i.e. a greater complexity and legal as well as political uncertainty in the passing of such bills.
Type de document :
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Liste complète des métadonnées
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : jeudi 17 juin 2021 - 14:32:42
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53




Olivier Rozenberg. When Rationalisation of Bureaucracy De-rationalizes Laws and Legislatures: ‘Monster Bills’ in France. Ittai Bar-Simon-Tov. Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Omnibus Legislation, Springer, pp.95 - 114, 2021, 9783030727482. ⟨hal-03263640⟩



Consultations de la notice