Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Unlearning some common tropes

Abstract : This chapter reflects on the last decade of scholarly reflections on the question of non-State actors and customary international law and revisits some of the specific argumentative constructions and presuppositions that have informed – and continue to inform – discourses on the contribution of non-State actors to the formationof customary international law. It is argued here that three tropes have been mechanically repeated in previous rounds of scholarly debates on non-State actors and customary law. These constructions can be summarised as follows: the idea that the two-element variant of the doctrine of customary international law originates in article 38 of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice; the continuous attachment of international lawyers – including the International Law Commission – to the distinction between practice and opinio juris; the understanding of the concept of non-State actors as a plain and innocent descriptive category.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, May 11, 2021 - 3:24:58 PM
Last modification on : Monday, February 14, 2022 - 4:20:02 PM




Jean d'Aspremont. Unlearning some common tropes. Sufyan Droubi; Jean D'aspremont. International organisations, non-State actors, and the formation of customary international law, Manchester University Press; Manchester University Press, pp.166 - 188, 2020, 9781526134158. ⟨hal-03224282⟩



Record views