Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Financial Regulation Debates in Hard Times: A Comparative Analysis of Insider and Outsider Pressure during the Global Financial Crisis

Abstract : This article analyses the nature of policy debates on financial regulation during the onset of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) by considering three elements that shape them: the salience of the debate, the actors that dominate the debate, and the degree of anti-status quo pressure. Theoretically, it contributes to Culpepper’s quiet/noisy politics framework by clarifying its multidimensionality and explicitly introducing the degree of contestation. Empirically, it focuses on two regulatory issues: (1) the restriction of banking and financial activities and (2) the debate on the remuneration of bankers. The data captures political claims during the first 12 months of the GFC and covers 19 established democracies. The findings indicate that policy debates were unevenly politicized across countries and issues, and that structural factors are not enough to account for the observed variation in pressure for reform for all types of actors, thus constituting a puzzle for further research.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03123359
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : mercredi 27 janvier 2021 - 17:59:34
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Roy Gava, Oriol Sabaté, Laura Morales. Financial Regulation Debates in Hard Times: A Comparative Analysis of Insider and Outsider Pressure during the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Springer Verlag, 2020, pp.Online. ⟨10.1080/13876988.2020.1859931⟩. ⟨hal-03123359⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

33