Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Directions of work or proceedings

Plausible Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical

Abstract : This special issue argues in favor of a new approach to the study of norms of warfare, which combines a normative analysis of ethical problems arising in war with an explanatory analysis of the use of force. Norms of warfare go as far back as Antiquity, and their study has followed a long historical path. In recent years, the ethics of war, mostly grounded in philosophy, has considerably expanded as a field. Notwithstanding such efforts to refine our normative knowledge of what should be just norms for the use of force, we argue that a more interdisciplinary approach is required to orient the study of the laws of war. In this Special Issue, proposals are made that, along with normative analysis, bring to the discussion not only disciplines such as political science and international relations, but also social theory, psychology and the neurosciences. We argue from a non-ideal perspective, that in order for norms to be just, they need to be ‘plausible’ for those who should abide by them. They also need to make sense in the context of democratic societies that favor a pluralistic debate on justice and ethics. Epistemically, we argue that, in order to understand if norms are plausible and just, reducing the gap between the normative and the empirical is required.
Document type :
Directions of work or proceedings
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, December 29, 2020 - 10:27:10 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, January 18, 2022 - 11:42:03 AM




Ariel Colonomos, Richard Beardsworth. Plausible Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical. Ariel Colonomos; Richard Beardsworth. European Review of International Studies, 7 (2 (December 2020)), Brill Publishers, pp.196, 2020. ⟨hal-03090036⟩



Record views