Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France: from technical perspective to legal evidence

Abstract : In France, judicial expertise operates within a specific institutional framework at the same time as it covers a distinctive community of practitioners called upon for their technical or scientific knowledge to serve justice. Indeed, while experts in the US are selected by the litigants, the French model features judge-appointed experts. This model could offer better guarantee of independence and neutrality, to the point that recent developments in the US suggest the emergence of a new court-appointed expert. What does such an institutional model involve in terms of evidence production? To answer this question, this paper looks at two areas of expertise in France: economic experts and forensic pathologists. Through an ethnography of the co-production of legal evidence, it analyses the black box of the French practices of legal expertise and allows the way in which the institutional context influences the producing of legal evidence, beyond differences between a scalpel and a calculator, to be understood.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03063937
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : lundi 14 décembre 2020 - 12:10:07
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53

Identifiants

Citation

Jérôme Pélisse, Romain Juston. The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France: from technical perspective to legal evidence. International Journal of Law in Context, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020, pp.1 - 18. ⟨10.1017/S1744552320000269⟩. ⟨hal-03063937⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

59