Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Enduring consensus: why the EU legislative process stays the same

Abstract : The multiple crises that the EU has faced over the last decade could lead observers to expect an increase in conflicts within its legislative process and, eventually, a shift from a consensual mode to a majoritarian and politicized mode. The dataset The EU Legislative Output 1996–2019 indicates that this has occurred only to a moderate extent. To explore this enduring consensus, we analyse quantitative and qualitative data on law making within the Council of the EU and the European Parliament and proceed to a systematic diachronic comparison. We argue that, as before the crisis, consensus remains a norm and results from cooperation based strategies. Furthermore, new factors, such as the extension of the ordinary legislative procedure, a pro-EU alliance within the European Parliament and the smaller number of legislative proposals, foster consensus.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02934717
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, September 9, 2020 - 3:40:43 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 1:59:53 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Stéphanie Novak, Olivier Rozenberg, Selma Bendjaballah. Enduring consensus: why the EU legislative process stays the same. Journal of European Integration / Revue d'Intégration Européenne, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2020, 43 (4), pp.475 - 493. ⟨10.1080/07036337.2020.1800679⟩. ⟨hal-02934717⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

67