Bottom-up collegiality, top-down collegiality, or inside-out collegiality? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Book Sections Year : 2020

Bottom-up collegiality, top-down collegiality, or inside-out collegiality?

(1)
1

Abstract

This paper argues that the analysis of multilevel networks (AMN) is useful to understand politics, institutional entrepreneurship, and social change. AMN helps identify multilevel relational infrastructures (in particular multilevel social status) on which institutional entrepreneurship depends, especially in collegial oligarchies as laboratories for social change. In heavily bureaucratized societies, these laboratories take various forms such as bottom-up collegiality, top-down collegiality, and inside-out collegiality. We argue that, in an era of vital transitions, one of the main challenges for social network analyses is to use AMN to observe these collegial oligarchies and to model and understand social (in)capacities to build alternative multilevel relational infrastructures promoting social change. This challenge leads to another: that of understanding the conditions under which a form of collegiality is selected by contextualizing institutional entrepreneurship and its multilevel relational infrastructures. The paper theorizes organized mobility and relational turnover as important dimensions of this contextualization of institutionalization processes.
Not file

Dates and versions

hal-02565251 , version 1 (06-05-2020)

Identifiers

Cite

Emmanuel Lazega. Bottom-up collegiality, top-down collegiality, or inside-out collegiality?: Research on joint regulation in multi-level relational infrastructures as laboratories for social change. Giancarlo Ragozini; Maria Prosperina Vitale. Challenges in Social Network Research, Springer, pp.17 - 31, 2020, 9783030314620. ⟨hal-02565251⟩
22 View
0 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More