Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries - Sciences Po Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Applied Philosophy Year : 2017

Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries


Does it matter that almost all juries in England and Wales are all-White? Does it matter, even if this result is the unintended and undesired result of otherwise acceptable ways of choosing juries? Finally, does it matter that almost all juries are all-White if this has no adverse effect on the treatment of non-White defendants and victims of crime? According to Cheryl Thomas, there is no injustice in a system of jury selection, which predictably results in juries with no minority members, so long as this result is not deliberate and does not adversely affect the treatment of minority defendants and victims of crime. My view is different. In and of itself, I believe, something is wrong with a system of jury selection that predictably results in all-White juries in a diverse society, such as our own. Absent reason to believe that we lack a better alternative to current modes of jury selection, a commitment to democratic government and to the equality of citizens – or so I will argue – condemns existing arrangements as unjust, whether or not they have adverse effects on jury decisions, or on the ways in which our society approaches issues of race and crime.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2015-lever-democracy-epistemology-and-the-problem-of-all-white-juries-v-auteur-fv.pdf (438.9 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-02506495 , version 1 (12-03-2020)



Annabelle Lever. Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2017, 34 (4), pp.541-556. ⟨10.1111/japp.12203⟩. ⟨hal-02506495⟩
50 View
266 Download



Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More