Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

‘A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting’: Some Reasons for Scepticism

Abstract : Liberal egalitarians such as Rawls and Dworkin, insist that a just society must try to make sure that socio‐economic inequalities do not undercut the value of the vote, and of other political liberties. They insist on this not just for instrumental reasons, but because they assume that democratic forms of political participation can be desirable ends in themselves. However, compulsory voting laws seem to conflict with respect for reasonable differences of belief and value, essential to liberal egalitarians. Nor is it clear that such laws would actually achieve their intended purpose. Consequently, it is doubtful that there is a ‘liberal defence of compulsory voting’, as Lacroix, among others, maintains.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : jeudi 12 mars 2020 - 13:51:44
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53




Annabelle Lever. ‘A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting’: Some Reasons for Scepticism. Politics, 2008, 28 (1), pp.61 - 64. ⟨hal-02506469⟩



Consultations de la notice