Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

How consensual is comitology?

Abstract : This contribution revisits the question of the alleged consensual and deliberative nature of comitology proceedings on new conceptual and empirical bases. On the conceptual plane, we argue that it is important to separate the analysis of decision-making from that of outcomes: the fact that committees generally end up ratifying Commission proposals does not mean the latter are never contested. Consensus and deliberation being closely related concepts, we propose to focus on dissent within committees, which we regard as an indicator of a non-deliberative process or an imperfect deliberation. Applying this approach to data from the comitology register, we show the existence of a sizeable rate of contestation in various fields, and offer a first analysis of the factors that may influence dissensus.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02405045
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 11, 2019 - 4:05:28 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 1:59:53 PM

Identifiers

Citation

Renaud Dehousse, Ana Mar Fernández Pasarín, Joan Pere Plaza. How consensual is comitology?. Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, 21 (6), pp.842 - 859. ⟨hal-02405045⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

66