Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Strategic voting in the laboratory

Abstract : The claim upon which most experiments in laboratories are conducted is that the random allocation of a treatment among various groups or individuals makes it possible to draw accurate inferences about causality. The laboratory is a context insulated from outside influences so that variations in behavior can be attributed to differences in treatment. Yet, the laboratory is not remote from all noises characterizing the ‘real world’. The issue of internal validity is probably overlooked too often because threats to external validity appear to be the most important (McDermott, 2002; Green and Gerber, 2004). Most experiments in political science are faced with potential threats to internal validity which are often unavoidable. The good news is that most of these problems have no significant impact on the results; the outcomes of an experiment prove to be rather resilient to marginal changes of core characteristics (as remarked earlier by Fiorina and Plott, 1978). This is our general argument, supported by a series of experiments on electoral systems and strategic voting.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02285468
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, September 12, 2019 - 5:14:44 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 1:59:53 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

André Blais, Nicolas Sauger, Jean-François Laslier, Karine van der Straeten. Strategic voting in the laboratory. Wolfgang J. Luhan; Bernhard Kittel; Rebecca B. Morton. Experimental Political Science, Routledge, pp.95 - 111, 2012, 9780230300859. ⟨hal-02285468⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

125