Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Sociological studies of diffusion: Is history relevant?

Abstract : The question of increasing similarity of forms and ideas is an important one in the social sciences in general. There are two main - and strikingly different - ways to account for increasing social similarity. The first is through an evolutionary or modernization type of argument, where increasing similarity reveals parallel but discrete processes of fit and adaptation. The second is through a diffusionist kind of argument, where forms and ideas circulate and spread across many different kinds of borders. Comparing three variants of the diffusionist argument, this article explores the different notions of time and history that these three variants reveal and express. While history always seems relevant, the way in which it is understood and plays out clearly varies across types. In conclusion, we suggest that recent developments in sociological studies of diffusion call, beyond history, to genealogical or archaeological research strategies.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [92 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01891990
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : mercredi 10 octobre 2018 - 11:26:06
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53
Archivage à long terme le : : vendredi 11 janvier 2019 - 13:31:17

Fichier

2008-djelic-sociological-studi...
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic. Sociological studies of diffusion: Is history relevant?. Socio-Economic Review, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2008, pp.1 - 20. ⟨hal-01891990⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

79

Téléchargements de fichiers

264