Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Ouvrage (y compris édition critique et traduction)

The Gamble of War: Is it Possible to Justify Preventive War?

Abstract : With the new millennium, prevention has become a popular doctrine in international politics. One of its most noticeable features is that democracies become inclined to strike first. In the US, it has served as the banner of the neo–conservative movement but it also gathered support from some liberals. It has also inspired several Israeli interventions. Does the preventive use of force meet the normative criteria that prevail or should prevail in a democratic system? Or does it endanger the legal and ethical traditions that characterize the history of Western military ethics? This book analyzes the justification of preventive war in contemporary asymmetrical international relations. It focuses on the most crucial aspect of prevention: uncertainty. Luck plays a significant role in these hazardous preventive wars, with unforeseen and sometimes unforeseeable consequences. This book bridges the explanatory analysis of uncertainty in preventive war making (using field work and data) with a normative account of prevention. It builds a new framework where the role of luck – whether military, political, moral, or normative – is a corrective to the traditional approaches of the Just War tradition. (Publisher's abstract)
Type de document :
Ouvrage (y compris édition critique et traduction)
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01519689
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : mardi 9 mai 2017 - 10:17:38
Dernière modification le : vendredi 2 juillet 2021 - 13:59:53

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Ariel Colonomos. The Gamble of War: Is it Possible to Justify Preventive War?. Macmillan Publishers, pp.288, 2013, Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. ⟨hal-01519689⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

80