Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Les sciences humaines et sociales face aux standards d’évaluation de la qualité académique : Enquête sur les pratiques de jugement dans une agence française

Abstract : Since 2000 in France, major transformations have affected the regulation of the academic field. The creation of national agencies - such as the French Evaluation Agency for Research and Higher Education (AERES) - went with a significant codification of academic assessment practices. If the establishment of evaluation standards has sparked debate and controversy, their impact on scientific judgment has not been yet fully investigated. Based on qualitative and quantitative data, this paper analyses how evaluators in the disciplines of literature and geography mobilise a set of heterogeneous resources to build their judgment, and how they enforce their disciplinary standards in a very constrained evaluation framework. A comprehensive approach of academic assessment in AERES shows that it is not reducible to one of the two ideal-types of judgment - peer review, standardized assessment – that might be presented as antagonists. Actually, within the Social Sciences and Humanities(SSH), some evaluators incorporate the AERES standards in order to reposition their discipline in the academic field, while others protect their professionalism by circumventing those standardized criteria. Analyzing the mechanisms by which the members of two disciplines tend to invalidate the Agency’s norms or tend to conform to its value scale, this papers reflects on the way academics (re)define the legitimacy of their professional practices when the rules of scientific consecration are subject to normalization.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01445916
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 2:30:53 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 20, 2021 - 11:49:13 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Clémentine Gozlan. Les sciences humaines et sociales face aux standards d’évaluation de la qualité académique : Enquête sur les pratiques de jugement dans une agence française. Sociologie, Presses Universitaires de France, 2016, 7 (3), pp.261 - 280. ⟨hal-01445916⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

165