HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

L’autonomie de la recherche scientifique en débats : évaluer "l'impact" social de la science

Abstract : Much research has shown that scientific activities, more now than in the past, are under pressure to justify their social and economic utility. There have, however, been few studies that explore the form that these demands for utility take in the evaluation processes. This article seeks to cast light on the formation of a criterion used to assess the links between science and society at AERES (research and higher education evaluation agency) in France. Initially titled “impact” of research, this criterion has aroused controversy between the members of the academic profession who forged it. Two factors combine in explaining the polarisation of the debate. The influence of academic disciplines affects whether “impact” attracts criticism or support as a criterion of scientific evaluation, but position effects within AERES are also crucial in understanding how the evaluation of activities at the frontiers of science has been able to become a legitimate criterion of research evaluation.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [23 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - 4:00:48 PM
Last modification on : Monday, March 21, 2022 - 2:49:48 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, November 14, 2016 - 5:22:22 PM


Files produced by the author(s)




Clémentine Gozlan. L’autonomie de la recherche scientifique en débats : évaluer "l'impact" social de la science. Sociologie du Travail, Association pour le développement de la sociologie du travail, 2015, 57 (2), pp.151 - 174. ⟨hal-01298207⟩



Record views


Files downloads