Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Social protection

Abstract : Conventional wisdom in European studies has long held that social policy is not an area in which the European Union can make a large difference. Solidarity, it is said, can only develop in societies where clear boundaries exist between individuals. Such is not the case in the EU, where a citizen's primary allegiance is to his own country. Redistribution being a zero-sum game, the majority method of decision-making is required, which may only be viable if the legitimacy of central institutions is clearly established. The legitimacy of the EU institutions, however, is said to be weak. In addition, a number of different traditions of welfare protection co-exist within the EU, as has been stressed by Gösta Esping-Andersen (1990). Citizens are strongly attached to their national brand of protection: in several countries, this is even regarded as a key element of national identity. The history of European integration has done little to belie these views. Social policy has experienced relatively modest progress, and the difficulties inherent in the adoption of European financial perspectives, undermined by the evils of "juste retour" have shown that redistribution and unanimity are indeed at odds (...).
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [11 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, September 19, 2014 - 11:12:51 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, September 27, 2022 - 1:26:50 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, April 14, 2017 - 4:13:26 PM


Explicit agreement for this submission




Renaud Dehousse. Social protection. 2008. ⟨hal-01066114⟩



Record views


Files downloads