Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Pré-publication, Document de travail

Social protection

Abstract : Conventional wisdom in European studies has long held that social policy is not an area in which the European Union can make a large difference. Solidarity, it is said, can only develop in societies where clear boundaries exist between individuals. Such is not the case in the EU, where a citizen's primary allegiance is to his own country. Redistribution being a zero-sum game, the majority method of decision-making is required, which may only be viable if the legitimacy of central institutions is clearly established. The legitimacy of the EU institutions, however, is said to be weak. In addition, a number of different traditions of welfare protection co-exist within the EU, as has been stressed by Gösta Esping-Andersen (1990). Citizens are strongly attached to their national brand of protection: in several countries, this is even regarded as a key element of national identity. The history of European integration has done little to belie these views. Social policy has experienced relatively modest progress, and the difficulties inherent in the adoption of European financial perspectives, undermined by the evils of "juste retour" have shown that redistribution and unanimity are indeed at odds (...).
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [11 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : vendredi 19 septembre 2014 - 11:12:51
Dernière modification le : lundi 21 juin 2021 - 17:42:09
Archivage à long terme le : : vendredi 14 avril 2017 - 16:13:26


Accord explicite pour ce dépôt




Renaud Dehousse. Social protection. 2008. ⟨hal-01066114⟩



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers