Social protection

Abstract : Conventional wisdom in European studies has long held that social policy is not an area in which the European Union can make a large difference. Solidarity, it is said, can only develop in societies where clear boundaries exist between individuals. Such is not the case in the EU, where a citizen's primary allegiance is to his own country. Redistribution being a zero-sum game, the majority method of decision-making is required, which may only be viable if the legitimacy of central institutions is clearly established. The legitimacy of the EU institutions, however, is said to be weak. In addition, a number of different traditions of welfare protection co-exist within the EU, as has been stressed by Gösta Esping-Andersen (1990). Citizens are strongly attached to their national brand of protection: in several countries, this is even regarded as a key element of national identity. The history of European integration has done little to belie these views. Social policy has experienced relatively modest progress, and the difficulties inherent in the adoption of European financial perspectives, undermined by the evils of "juste retour" have shown that redistribution and unanimity are indeed at odds (...).
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
2008
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [11 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01066114
Contributeur : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository <>
Soumis le : vendredi 19 septembre 2014 - 11:12:51
Dernière modification le : mardi 11 octobre 2016 - 13:29:16
Document(s) archivé(s) le : vendredi 14 avril 2017 - 16:13:26

Fichier

cahiers-europeens-03-2008.pdf
Accord explicite pour ce dépôt

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Renaud Dehousse. Social protection. 2008. 〈hal-01066114〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

78

Téléchargements de fichiers

59