The Economic Impact of an EU-US Open Aviation Area Study prepared for the European Commission The Brattle Group, pdf> 40 Only the UK, Ireland, Spain, and Greece have not concluded open skies with the United States. 41 Interview on. Interestingly, the U.S. observer put it similarly, " after all our frustration in negotiating with the British, it cannot be worse with the Commission, 2002. ,
Towards a Transatlantic Common Aviation Area. Policy Statement Brussels: Association of European Airlines. <short version: http://www.aea.be/Topics&Views/downloads/tcaa.htm> ATA Airlines in Crisis: the Perfect Economic Storm Air Transport Association, External Aviation Relations. Policy Statement. October. Brussels: Association of European Airlines Communication from the Commission on the consequences of the Court judgment of 5 November 2003: Communication from the Commission on the relations between the Community and third countries in the field of air transport. COM (2003) 94 final, 1995. ,
The European Court of Justice Decision on Bilateral Agreements ? the Future of Relations, In: Air and Space Lawyer, vol.173, 2003. ,
1988: I Would Do It Again, 1988. ,
Deregulation and Globalization: Liberalizing International Air Services, 1988. ,
Air Transport The European Union and National Industrial Policy, pp.106-131, 1996. ,
Open Skies" or Open Markets? The Effect of the ECJ Judgements on Aviation Relations between the EU and the USA. Session, 0317. ,
Air Transport Liberalization in the European Union: An Assessment, In: Regional Studies, vol.318, pp.807-822, 1997. ,
The Economic Impact of an EU-US Open Aviation Area. Study prepared for the European Commission The Brattle Group, 2002. ,
The liberalization and reregulation of air transport, Journal of European Public Policy, vol.5, issue.3, pp.441-466, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1080/135017698343910
Open Skies Agreements and the European Court of Justice. Paper presented at conference on American Bar Association, 2002. ,
Globalization and the Prospect of Policy Convergence in Air Transport, In: Global Society, vol.142, pp.279-296, 2000. ,