Norms, advice networks and joint economic governance: the case of conflicts among shareholders at the commercial court of Paris - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2011

Norms, advice networks and joint economic governance: the case of conflicts among shareholders at the commercial court of Paris

Résumé

Businesses are usually very keen to participate in the governance of their markets (Lazega and Mounier, 2002, 2003; Falconi et al., 2005). In this chapter, we combine a sociological perspective on joint governance of markets with an economic perspective, such as that of Dixit (2009) that deals with issues of social optimality of private or public governance and enforcement institutions. Institutional and neo-institutional economic theory often separate official governance institutions from private self-governance (Greif, 1996; Ellickson, 1991; Milgrom et al., 1990; Williamson, 1985). At the inter-organizational level, at least two different sociological traditions also deal with the issue of self and exogenous governance of markets, comparing the formal and often exogenous aspects with informal and endogenous ones (...).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
conflictsamongshareholders-tcp-ugur-chapter3.pdf (146.76 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Accord explicite pour ce dépôt
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01054015 , version 1 (04-08-2014)

Identifiants

Citer

Emmanuel Lazega, Lise Mounier, Paola Tubaro. Norms, advice networks and joint economic governance: the case of conflicts among shareholders at the commercial court of Paris. Ugur Mehmeth, Sunderland David. Does Economic governance matter ? Governance Institutions and Outcomes, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.46-70, 2011, 9780857931764. ⟨hal-01054015⟩
132 Consultations
219 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More