Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Essay: Can Human Rights Practice Be a Critical Project - A View from the Ground

Abstract : Critics have condemned human rights advocacy as being a deeply problematic solution to the sub-subsistence poverty that plagues the post-colonial Global South. This Essay discusses the efforts of four economic and social rights advocates working in Africa. Each succeeded by working within, but unconfined by, the approaches of the traditional human rights advocacy framework. The innovative strategies the advocates deployed may promote progressive institutional innovation in the provision of social welfare benefits. Still, single instances of innovation may not have an enduring impact on either extreme poverty or global inequality, the problems facing the Global South.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [4 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01023794
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 11:34:46 AM
Last modification on : Friday, July 30, 2021 - 9:08:13 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, November 21, 2014 - 5:18:00 PM

File

loyola2010pdf.pdf
Explicit agreement for this submission

Identifiers

Collections

`

Citation

Lucie E. White, Jeremy Perelman. Essay: Can Human Rights Practice Be a Critical Project - A View from the Ground. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Loyola Law School; 1999, 2010, 44 (1), pp.157-175. ⟨hal-01023794⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

271

Files downloads

381