, 79) 155; Heymann (n 30
, 206 ff; Mills (n 26) especially 295, pp.312-338
, Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order International Organization 1
, The Great Transformation, Public Governance in the Age of Globalization, p.89, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470755679.ch4
, Joerges and Falke n rightly compare this observation to Foucaultts analysis of the rationality of market governance (Introduction, p 3) See too, on the hegemony of the economic system in a functionally differentiated society
, Two Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850? Suffolk University Law Review 631. For an equally severe critique on development?as implemented by the World Bank? and as driven by a private epistemology, see K Bayliss, The World Bank and Privatization: A Flawed Development Tool, 2001.
, Rights as Footprints: A New Metaphor for Contemporary Human Rights Practice 9, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, vol.27
, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate arguing for tripartism (the participation of local public interest groups) in workplace regulation, 1992.
, § 58. judgments. Both instances may be read as an attempt to give voice to the policies of the most affected community, all the while making room for overarching (Union) policies. Externalities imposed on those who were not present during the decision-making process are internalised. For more extensive discussion of the economic and constitutional function of these rules, see Muir Watt (n 57) §219 ff. 378 On legal irritants see G Teubner, Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law, or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergence Modern Law Review 11. On methodology impelled by the impact of human rights in cross-border situations, see above, n 297. 379 While the sweeping effect of human rights before the recognising court has been illustrated principally in the field of family law, an excellent illustration of the idea of a correlative duty appears, outside this field, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises the reading by US federal courts of the conditions for certifying classes, particularly the superiority requirement of Article 23(b) 3 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when a proposed class action has a vocation to include parties from abroad, pp.242-76, 2007.
, Choice of Law and the States )nterest in Protecting its Own William and Mary Law Review 173
, Quelques observations sur les règles internationales relatives à lapplication extraterritoriale du droitt 1986) Annuaire Français Droit International 7?52. On the emerging principle of home country control over corporate conduct abroad in the context of foreign investment, see Sornarajah, pp.155-162, 2000.