Saving the Banks: The Political Economy of Bailouts

Emiliano Grossman (1) , Cornelia Woll (2)

1 CEE - Centre d'études européennes et de politique comparée (Sciences Po, CNRS)
2 CERI - Centre de recherches internationales (Sciences Po, CNRS)

How much leeway did governments have in designing bank bailouts and deciding on the height of intervention during the 2007-2009 financial crisis? This paper analyzes comparatively what explains government responses to banking crises. Why does the type of intervention during financial crises vary to such a great extent across countries? By analyzing the variety of bailouts in Europe and North America, we will show that the strategies governments use to cope with the instability of financial markets does not depend on economic conditions alone. Rather, they take root in the institutional and political setting of each country and vary in particular according to the different types of business-government relations banks were able to entertain with public decision-makers. Still, "crony capitalism" accounts overstate the role of bank lobbying. With four case studies of the Irish, Danish, British and French bank bailout, we show that countries with close one-on-one relationships between policy-makers and bank management tended to develop unbalanced bailout packages, while countries where banks have strong interbank ties and collective negotiation capacity were able to develop solutions with a greater burden sharing from private institutions.

Domaines: Science politique

Emiliano Grossman, Cornelia Woll. Saving the Banks: The Political Economy of Bailouts. 2012. ⟨hal-00972960⟩